27 · 11 · 17

Ganadores del 15° FICM: entrevista a Daniel Nájera Betancourt

Berenice Andrade

Cuenta Daniel Nájera Betancourt que la historia de Vuelve a mí, película ganadora del Ojo a Cortometraje de Ficción Mexicano en el 15° Festival Internacional de Cine de Morelia (FICM), le saltó a la vista en una ida al mercado por calditos de res. El realizador de Chihuahua encontró en ese mercado, casi en el abandono, la oportunidad para fijarse en la vida de esos otros a los que nadie piensa, en las tragedias cotidianas que suceden, sobre todo y como si cualquier cosa, en las zonas marginadas del país.

Con el apoyo del Programa de Estímulo a la Creación del Desarrollo Artístico (PECDA) y de sus amigos, Daniel logró concretar la historia de Rosita y Josué, un par de hermanos que llegan a la ciudad de Chihuahua para trabajar en un mercado. Allí Rosita conoce a Eulalio, un maleante que comienza a separarlos hasta que un día ella desaparece sin dejar rastro.

The film does not show violence scandalously or stridently, in fact, the disappearance of the girl is perceived as something commonplace, natural. How did you manage to show the tragedy as something mundane, without any type of emotional blackmail?

How to portray a disappearance? Well, as they happen in life: How was the last time someone saw someone who disappeared? Surely, it happened in a common, everyday situation. It's not like "meanwhile, somewhere else..." and the girl appears in a trash can, in a bag.

What I wanted to do was a short film based on life as a child sees it, from their perspective. A teacher used to say they are like mosaics of time: "I remember the road to Chihuahua, damn long road, there were heaven and my sister. Then I remember that when we arrived, it was already late night and I was sleepy. Then I remember that I was in the market, walking, and the cheeses, the ranchero cheese with jalapeño was very good, the fat lady who was gossiping around. I remember they invited us to play, and there was a guy who was with my sister, and suddenly my sister came out crying, and I remember the last time I saw my sister." They are all like fragments of memory, that's why they don't have music. In life, his or ours, we do not have a soundtrack. Everything is raw. The sum of this memory plus another.

My character is probably going to remember all this time in which he came to the city and lost his sister as shown in the short: no music, noisy, the dust, and a sister who seems to have been swallowed by it. It's more like an evocation: how I felt life beyond how I saw it. I tried to make a feeling, there is nothing gimmicky, there are no parts that say, "cry here".

Why tell the story this way?

Everything was to experiment. I don't think I have a style yet, so I'm going to try this voice. The next short could be a reggaetón musical, to say something. That is, something I haven't done before. But, in the end, the search will nourish me. Maybe nobody will like it, and how cool if nobody likes it because then nobody is going to tell me how to do something different.

It would be very easy to say that I found a little formula which I am going to follow. No, I'm 28 years old, I'm too young to say that I already have my voice. I see it as my favorite directors: they see the short film as a place to experiment. Wes Anderson, Francis Ford Coppola, Julián Hernández do in their shorts what they do not allow themselves in their feature films; they test. The short film is the place I want to go back to test voices, to satisfy that urge to express things differently.

When seeing Back to Me, although it feels complete as a short film, it also seems that it could be told in a more extended and detailed way. Did you ever consider it?

Yes, we had material for over an hour, but the story felt loose when made longer. For example, there were very long shots, suddenly it felt fake. Like I went, "I'm going to leave the camera there for a while because I'm an 'artist', and only I understand my intentions". No, you see what you need to see, which allows the idea to be understood.

What did being part of FICM mean to you?

I didn't know what it was like to weep with joy until I knew I was in the Official Selection, even if it sounds corny. This year wasn't a good one. One day, I looked my dad and I said, "Maybe you're right, this isn't my thing. I don't feel that I belong in this world. I don't have direction in life right now".

At the awards, I thought maybe I didn't deserve to be there, but they were giving me a hand. The ugliest thing in had happened. Maybe something worse would come along, but I spent 28 years being a failure.

Now, I know why everyone is dying to be at the Morelia Festival.

Do you have any special memories of your experience at FICM?

I always wanted to meet the four I met one night: Alfonso Cuarón, whom I said hello to on the red carpet, like a groupie; Guillermo del Toro, who went to say hello to everyone; and Amat Escalante and Carlos Reygadas were also there. The funny thing is that everyone was in line waiting for del Toro and when Reygadas passed by, I was the one who ran behind him. I said: "I'm almost completely here because of what you've done, what a joy it is being able to tell you in person. It's a good day." That was awesome.

In the paradise known as the hospitality, I ran into Elisa Miller, who I am a big fan of. I saw her, I turned pale and said: "I really like what you do, can I take a picture with you? I'm a fan." I look super happy in the photo.

What I felt most strongly about was to see who has won the previous years. I have thought that I don't deserve to be among them, but I am and that brings me a lot of joy.